|
Doug Cranmer Huxwhukw mask Timeline of the Potlatch Conflict The Museum Compromise
|
Timeline of the Potlatch Conflict
|
|
In 1889,
Hamasak was arrested and tried under the new law by Indian Agent Reginald
Pidcock. Hamasak pled guilty, and was sentenced to six months' imprisonment,
but was also scheduled for trial in Victoria. Presiding Judge Sir Matthew
Begbie dismissed the case, pointing out the law's flaws. "…from all I know
of the gatherings, I think [the potlatch] would be very hard to explain."
(Cole and Chaikin 35) Begbie knew that "different people appear to have
very different notions as to what the word means." (Bracken 92) It would
be almost impossible to convict future violators until a clearer definition
was established. This point was also made by Hamasak's supporters, who asked,
"why should we be threatened by arrest all the time when we don't know what
is required of us?" (Bracken 81) Begbie further explained
that "to create an offense previously unknown to the law there ought to
be some definition of it in the statute." (Cole and Chaikin 35) Begbie's
decision stated the law could not accept the guilty plea of an Indian who
couldn't speak English, for "an offence the facts constituting which we
should ourselves be unable to set forth." (Cole and Chaikin 36)
The first case had been a failure.
In
1895, Section 114 of the Indian Act was amended: "Every Indian or
other person who engages in, or ass
Photos from Cole and Chaikin Top: Matthew Begbie, 41 Bottom: blankets collected for potlatches, 87
|
||